Historical Dissertations Defended in 2004

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Explication Defended

How can formal methods be applied to philosophical problems that involve informal concepts of ordinary language? Carnap answered this question by describing a methodology that he called “explication.” Strawson objected that explication changes the subject and does not address the original philosophical problem; this paper shows that Carnap’s response to that objection was inadequate and offers ...

متن کامل

Defended by

The World Wide Web (WWW) is a huge information network within which searching for relevant quality contents remains an open question. The ambiguity of natural language is traditionally one of the main reasons, which prevents search engines from retrieving information according to users’ needs. However, the globalized access to the WWW via Weblogs or social networks has highlighted new problems....

متن کامل

Conceptual Truth Defended

Since (2) and (3) entail that someone could have justified true belief but no knowledge, we may conclude that knowledge cannot be justified true belief. In much the same vein, Davidson (1987, 47) devises his swampman-scenario to convince us that historical properties are essential for meaning, and Searle (1984) intends his story of the Chinese room to make us see that understanding is not reduc...

متن کامل

OODBMS Architectures Defended

As a preface, the intent of the original article "OODBMS Architectures", was to offer an adopter of OODB technology practical knowledge that would facilitate a successful adoption. Practical not theoretical advice, because at the end of the day, each of us must create scalable systems around the practical limitations of the individual components of those systems. And so, I think it is important...

متن کامل

Epistemic contextualism defended

Epistemic contextualists think that the extension of the expression ‘knows’ (and its cognates) depends on and varies with the context of utterance. In the last 15 years or so this view has faced intense criticism. This paper focuses on two sorts of objections. The first are what I call the ‘linguistic objections’, which purport to show that the best available linguistic evidence suggests that ‘...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Lithuanian Historical Studies

سال: 2005

ISSN: 1392-2343,2538-6565

DOI: 10.30965/25386565-01001009